The topic of bank resolution in the Eurozone is again in the headlines, with possible controversial actions in two countries that often find themselves at opposite sides of the argument – Italy and Germany. Both threaten to undermine the progress
that the Eurozone has made over the past years to a Single Market in banking and thus a more sustainable currency union.
In Italy, there are – not surprisingly - more bank failures. On January 2, the ECB appointed temporary
administrators at Banca Carige, based in Genoa, after shareholders were unable to secure additional equity. The problems in Banca Carige are not new, but the can had been kicked down the road until late last year. The Italian government seems to stand
ready to pour money into Banca Carige via the instrument of precautionary recapitalization (as also applied to Monte dei Paschi in Siena in 2017) even though this bank cannot really be considered a systemically important financial institution. Also,
guarantees of Carige’s bondholders go through the Italian deposit insurance scheme, thus transferring contingent liabilities to the rest of the Italian banking system. However, the bail-out goes beyond this specific case. According
to news reports, Italy’s government has set up a 1.6 billion euro fund to compensate investors who have lost their money in a string of recent bank liquidations. This will pay junior bondholders up to 95 percent of the original value of the investment
and shareholders up to 30 percent. While this arrangement is almost exclusively for retail investors, it certainly extends the financial safety net far beyond what has been agreed under the new European bail-in rules. And even if one can make the case for
compensation for retail investors that were mis-sold junior securities in banks, there is no case to be made to compensate equity holders!
Ultimately, the Italian-style bank resolution over the past two/three years is a big step backwards
to the era of bail-outs. It is also a reflection of the failed politics of kicking the can down the road when it comes to bank resolution – the Italian government had ample opportunities to clean up its banking system before the BRRD came into force;
however, it is also a failure on the European level that new rules come into place for a continuously weak banking system whose structural deficiencies have not been addressed yet.
While Italy thus undermines the bail-in principle
of the banking union, the German government is going even a step further, trying to “renationalise” banking sector policies, thus actively undermining the Single Market in Banking. In the spirit of industrial policy and creating national
champions, there seem to be government efforts under way to facilitate a possible merger of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, the two largest privately-owned banks in the fragmented
German market. While the argument of consolidation and reducing overbanking might make sense, the creation of a national champion as explicitly aimed at by the Minister of Finance seems mistaken if not dangerous. Such a bank would be considered German and
with active political involvement in its creation would immediately raise further bail-out expectations in case things do not work out as planned. It also undermines level playing field within the Eurozone - fiscally strong countries such as Germany can support
their banking systems, while others cannot. This also shows the hypocrisy of German commentators when criticising bail-outs in Italy (as politely pointed out by Isabel
Schnabel in this German commentary).
Both the Italian and the German actions counter the enormous progress made over the past years towards a single regulatory framework for the Eurozone. Let’s remind ourselves – the most
immediate reason for the banking union was to cut the link between sovereign and bank fragility (a target which has not really been achieved, but this is for another day); however, the broader objective is that of creating a Single Market in Banking without
which the Eurozone would not be a sustainable currency union. However, this implies a move away from national champions and purely national actions.
The Eurozone has made big strides towards a Single Market in Banking with the establishment
of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. Important elements (most notably a European Deposit Insurance Scheme) are still missing. However, a Single Market in Banking is not only about the legal framework but political actions.
Both the Italian and the German governments have shown over the past weeks that they are not willing to “walk the talk”. Not only have the lessons of the Global Financial Crisis been forgotten, but also the lesson of the Eurozone crisis that national
financial safety net and national banking sector policies undermine the Eurozone!